10th ave

[Cappy]

Was a couple of weeks ago at 10th ave a saturday I believe; saw a Asian

girl. I'm terrible at names Nicole I think, she said she normally only works

evenings she was slim petite great body said her thighs were big,I thought

were perfect stood by the shower and helped clean me up before the session

I'm sure she would have striped down and joined me if I would have invited

her.[ kick myself ] she was very pretty and had a album of photos she

seemed to enjoy showing. she was resposive to touch , quite vocal, and

enjoyed my attemps to please her. unrushed and for the happy ending she

put her bussiness in my face a nice touch I thought. session was fun and full

of energy. only draw back I would mention was she was a bit too chatty. I

had a great time and will repeat as soom as I'm back in the big city.

 

[~*RoCKAnGel*~]

Too chatty? Then it was a real GFE!

 

[jack skellington]

Thanks for the review bigguy. I pass by 10th Ave every day and have always wondered if it was worth dropping in...I might give it a try some day for a quick nooner!!

 

[Animal Craze]

I went in about couple weeks ago,no fs but enthusiastic cbj.Too chatty for sure.

 

[I Cheetah All The Time]

I agree with the too chatty part..... the bj should shut her up for a while, no?

 

[hvnsynt]

Nice review except there was no mention of services or $$?

RB

 

[LindaLoo]

yea fillin' the throat is a great way to cut down on the chatter!

 

[CB#32]

Sorry to hijack the thread, but.....
I remember hearing a while ago that 10th Ave. had CCTV cameras pointing at the door (on the inside). Is this still true? I am not sure if I feel comfortable going into a place where I know I am being recorded.

 

[Don A]

they have cameras at the door and at the entrances to the rooms

 

[Greco]

Hope they liked the pics of my hat and sunglasses.$40 for cbj

 

[loh m]

Not as much as they liked this one!

 

[raider nation]

Ya they got cameras in hall way and corridor but definitely not in rooms ; obviously it's for protection of the girls- many places are equiped with same for example carrie's

 

[Aleisha]

Cross me off from going to Carrie's again.

 

[barbara b]

What makes you so sure they do not have them in the rooms?

 

[Mykayla]

honestly i thought they all had a cam hidden somewhere in the reception area. i think you'd be surprised how many do

 

[Thi]

Betcha that most owners use them to make sure the SP's report all the income.

 

[Roz]

In what way does a camera protect the girls? Every convenience store/gas station in the city has them but it doesn't keep them from being robbed. The cameras only give a false sense of security.

 

[Mandrake]

Was suprised to read about cctv

 

[Pompal 09.]

I got to thinking more about this topic and I think I need to voice my thoughts.

Now I know that guys are paranoid about what happens to the video that their face is on, but I understand why they maybe doing. We are talking a business that deals with strictly cash for the most part. Some hoodlum is going to figure this out one day and the MP, with maybe one or two girls working would make a pretty tempting target. Now cctv is not going to stop this from happening, but at least whomever does do it, will be caught on video.

If you do some research into cctv you can buy a pretty cheap 4 camera DVR and set it up yourself. They record on a continous loop where the oldest data get over written. Generally it would only keep upwards of a weeks video depending on the activity that is recorded. If you need to access the video to review it all you need is a cheap monitor. Most come with a built in CDR to make copies of the video when needed.

Now legally (I believe) they should be posting that the premise is under constant or periodic video surveillance. Otherwise they could get themselve into some hot water. But if the camera is in plan sight, one would think that would be warning enough to the person walking in the door.

Anyway, I have no problem if they do have cctv, just asl long as it is being used for the appropriate reason.

 

[manstar375]

I agree with Olmac, but dare I raise that weirdness of the videos and the infamous fireman... back in 2002?